Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day
 

You must log in or register to post. Registration is free! [ Register ]

The Recording Project Forum Index -> Cool Edit Pro / Adobe Audition

FAQ Search Photo Album!
 Audition v 2.0
View previous topic :: View next topic 
Post new topic  Reply to topic
Author Message
rustyfingers Offline



Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 1466
Location: Americo
Age: 50


PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:29 pm    Post subject: Audition v 2.0 Reply with quote

http://store.adobe.com/store/products/master.jhtml?id=catAudition

129. Dollars to upgrade 349. for newbs.

Has ASIO and a buch of other crap I don't understand.

My CEP 2.0 download was around 16MB this sum'bitch is 554 MB ...

Thats 554 MB.

I think that these guys have started adding useless code to make the program larger to discourage warez users. That's the only explanation for such a bigonomus file.

_________________
message
Back to top
View user's profile
ramen Offline
DafDuckling


Joined: 19 Mar 2004
Posts: 13887
Location: Chicago...ish
Age: 30


PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interface looks cooler, but the upgraded features aren't really up my alley.
_________________
a little misunderstanding? Galileo and the Pope had a little misunderstanding!
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
FrederickRM Offline
Amazing Member


Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 685
Location: Denver, Colorado
Age: 55


PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll bet they added smaples and loops. That's the reason most apps are that large. Or worse, they added DEMOS of their other software...
_________________
Trilennium - electronic music
Bedlam Abbey - Renaissance, Celtic, World music
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dobro Offline
more personal tittle


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 11393
Age: 11


PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Samples and loops is my guess too.

Aside from being ASIO-frendy, what does 2.0 have that you can't live without?

_________________
I always find my way back somehow. I don't even bring bread crumbs. - MBrane

My points are often wrong but they're always good ones. - Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lee Tyler Offline
Active Member


Joined: 26 Dec 2003
Posts: 205
Location: Cape Coral, Florida


PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the new features are documented for the offing all over the net. I never thought that the new automation utility would be more helpful than volume envelopes. Boy, was I wrong! What increased expressiveness I experienced on the very first test piece. BOOOOYAH, BABY! Worth the price JUST for the automation feature. And the response to the faders is instantaneous. Trial version just expired and I whipped out the plastic and ordered the upgrade boxed version for 129. Now, if I could only find some time to..... Razz

LT
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
dobro Offline
more personal tittle


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 11393
Age: 11


PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay, educate me. How does automation work?
_________________
I always find my way back somehow. I don't even bring bread crumbs. - MBrane

My points are often wrong but they're always good ones. - Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Lee Tyler Offline
Active Member


Joined: 26 Dec 2003
Posts: 205
Location: Cape Coral, Florida


PostPosted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dobro wrote:
Okay, educate me. How does automation work?


In MT mode and the mixer open, you can move your faders in TRUE real time and get the volume changes recorded as you want. I just touched the surface mind you, but this instinctive expressive ability to dynamically adjust your own music track by track on the fly is cool. Very cool. Give the trial a go.

LT
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
lpdeluxe Offline
Active Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 124


PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 7:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That was why I invested the (small amount of) money, time and effort learning new software in v.2.0. That automation brings it into the 21st Century, which, oddly enough, means that it now emulates what your Neve console would have done in 1965....
Back to top
View user's profile
dobro Offline
more personal tittle


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 11393
Age: 11


PostPosted: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gee, I've never used automation, so I'm talking out another orifice here, but it seems to me that I can get *much* more accuracy drawing volume envelopes on tracks than I can on the fly with a fader. I mean, being able to adjust the levels on the fly must be a skill in itself, right? Or is the skill-and-inevitable-error factor part of the charm?
_________________
I always find my way back somehow. I don't even bring bread crumbs. - MBrane

My points are often wrong but they're always good ones. - Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
lpdeluxe Offline
Active Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Posts: 124


PostPosted: Tue Apr 11, 2006 5:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2.0 gives you the option of doing it either way. A lot of persons grew up using analog gear, and mixing on the fly from one deck to another, and for them (and, sometimes, for me) automation is the real deal. OTOH, as you say, there's the matter of exactitude when you're clicking on envelope handles. Obviously, this eliminates the issue of latency (either brain/hand or computer) in precisely defining fades and so on.

I don't want to say it's a left-brain/right-brain thing, but it can be. Some people love the gestural freedom of smacking a fader and inventing some awesome new sound on the spot, while others prefer to make the damn machine do it their way.

I do it both ways, but since I've invested in a Mackie Control, I feel like I'm getting a little more of my money's worth.Wink
Back to top
View user's profile
Lee Tyler Offline
Active Member


Joined: 26 Dec 2003
Posts: 205
Location: Cape Coral, Florida


PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dobro wrote:
Gee, I've never used automation, so I'm talking out another orifice here, but it seems to me that I can get *much* more accuracy drawing volume envelopes on tracks than I can on the fly with a fader. I mean, being able to adjust the levels on the fly must be a skill in itself, right? Or is the skill-and-inevitable-error factor part of the charm?


Honestly, I only used automation once, and immediately I realized that the "musician in me" instinctually felt a need to play with faders as you go.... as opposed to solely looking at envelopes for volume control. I can however see myself fine tuning my automation values via envelopes as normal operating procedure in the near future. I am sooooo behind the 8-ball in equipment! I guess I am in 1967 mode. LOL

LT
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website
sikter Offline
Newbie


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Mon May 08, 2006 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I’m going to look very stupid but it’s not first time.
I used to play with those automations things and for one particular project I really need to turn it off and use envelopes. But I forget how to do that!
Back to top
View user's profile
dobro Offline
more personal tittle


Joined: 01 Nov 2003
Posts: 11393
Age: 11


PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 11:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey I've got a question about the automation feature in 2.0. If you do levels on the fly with a fader, does 2.0 then draw the volume envelope on the track according to what you've done with the fader? And can you then tweak that envelope, fine tune it with standard volume envelope procedure?
_________________
I always find my way back somehow. I don't even bring bread crumbs. - MBrane

My points are often wrong but they're always good ones. - Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website
sikter Offline
Newbie


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2006 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dobro wrote:
Hey I've got a question about the automation feature in 2.0. If you do levels on the fly with a fader, does 2.0 then draw the volume envelope on the track according to what you've done with the fader? And can you then tweak that envelope, fine tune it with standard volume envelope procedure?

It is possible but I never looked at it.
I know that software records those changes and gives you possibility to edit those envelopes if you are using an external hardware control for AA (which I’m not). I am sure it’s same if you do it directly on software.
You can record even PAN and effects changes while playing your tracks.
I found out about how to undo automation and now everything makes more sense. There are modes like read, touch, latch and write.
It’s been a while since I worked with AA 2,0. When I “played” with it last time I did not look at any connections between those two views. I will today when I come home. I was travelling a lot and didn’t have much time for my music lately.
I'll tell you something funny about me learning how to use AA 2,0.
When I made my first mix in AA 2,0 I was too exited and thought that I found nice “preset” for project. Then I made a copy of section and replaced all tracks with corresponding tracks from another project. Ha ha. Then I found out that automation is messing my envelopes and couldn’t remember how to turn it off. (I used just 5-6 tracks for training)
Back to top
View user's profile
sikter Offline
Newbie


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 12


PostPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hello again. I have tested it and it works.
There was a little bit confusing for a while because I was aspecting to get main volume envelope to edit. That doesn't happen.
There is another envelope which is in function after automation.
I marked it with No 3 on my picture.

Here you can view other automation envelopes by selecting at 5.
1 = main volume envelope (you can edit this one manualy but I wouldn't do both)
2= main PAN envelope

4= here you chose mode for automation
Off Ignores track envelopes during playback and mixdown, but continues to display envelopes so you can manually add or adjust edit points.
Read Applies track envelopes during playback and mixdown, but doesn’t record any changes you make to them. (You can preview such changes, but edit points return to recorded settings.)
Latch Records adjustments you make to settings and creates corresponding edit points on track envelopes. Begins recording when you first adjust a setting, and continues to record new settings until playback stops.
Touch Similar to Latch, but returns settings to previously recorded values when you stop adjusting them.
Write Similar to Latch, but records current settings as edit points when playback starts, without waiting for a setting to change.
You can protect from automation selected functions by pressing bottom at 6.
I hope this helps
See you!
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:    View previous topic :: View next topic 
Quick Reply      
Use this form to post a quick reply without having to go through the normal reply process.    
     
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Recording Project Forum Index -> Cool Edit Pro / Adobe Audition All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
Jump to:  


Free Shipping on all orders over $99.

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum